1948 Toyota SA vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Toyota SA would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1948 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1948 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 793 kg more than 1948 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Toyota SA | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Toyota | Mazda |
Model | SA | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 994 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2875 mm |