1948 Volvo PV 60 vs. 1999 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1999 Honda CR-V is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda CR-V (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1999 Honda CR-V.
Because 1999 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Volvo PV 60 | 1999 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Volvo | Honda |
| Model | PV 60 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2620 mm |
