1948 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1948 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1948 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Volvo PV 60 | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Volvo | Honda |
Model | PV 60 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |