1948 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 582 kg more than 2010 Honda Jazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Volvo PV 60 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Volvo | Honda |
| Model | PV 60 | Jazz |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1245 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 77 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1048 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |
