1948 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (397 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 165 kg more than 1948 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Volvo PV 60 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Volvo | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | PV 60 | E |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1795 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |
