1949 AC 2-Litre vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1966 Triumph 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1949 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1949 AC 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 AC 2-Litre weights approximately 150 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 AC 2-Litre. (136 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1949 AC 2-Litre | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | 2-Litre | 2000 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 64 L |