1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1947 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 440 kg more than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1947 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1947 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | 6C | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1947 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2040 mm |
