1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1949 Bristol 400
To start off, both 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C and 1949 Bristol 400 were released in the same year (1949). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 330 kg more than 1949 Bristol 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1949 Bristol 400 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Bristol |
Model | 6C | 400 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 54 L |