1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1950 Allard K2
To start off, 1950 Allard K2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 305 kg more than 1950 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1950 Allard K2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
Model | 6C | K2 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |