1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1951 Jeep CJ3A is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 440 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 6C | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1949 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2040 mm |