1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 74 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Studebaker |
Model | 6C | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1949 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2980 mm |