1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1959 BMW 503
To start off, 1959 BMW 503 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 BMW 503 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 BMW 503 (139 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 BMW 503 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1959 BMW 503 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | 6C | 503 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |