1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1962 Austin A 60
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 382 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1962 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 6C | A 60 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 39 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1118 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 45 L |