1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1962 Austin A 99

To start off, 1962 Austin A 99 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 99 (110 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 99 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Alfa Romeo 6C 1962 Austin A 99
Make Alfa Romeo Austin
Model 6C A 99
Year Released 1949 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 2912 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 83.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 88.9 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4950 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 77 L 34 L