1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1962 DKW Munga is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 290 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | DKW |
Model | 6C | Munga |
Year Released | 1949 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 68 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 31 L |