1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1965 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 614 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
| Model | 6C | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2250 mm |
