1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1966 Alpine A 110
To start off, 1966 Alpine A 110 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 955 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1966 Alpine A 110 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
| Model | 6C | A 110 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 62 L |
