1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 434 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2210 mm |
