1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1972 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1972 Toyota Corona is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 94 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 404 kg more than 1972 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1972 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 6C | Corona |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1705 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2740 mm |
