1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1975 Audi 50
To start off, 1975 Audi 50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 689 kg more than 1975 Audi 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1975 Audi 50 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | 50 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
