1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1975 Volvo 66 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 730 kg more than 1975 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | 6C | 66 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
