1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 324 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
Model | 6C | Eclat |
Year Released | 1949 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |