1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1980 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1980 Triumph TR8 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,523 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Triumph TR8 (138 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 685 kg more than 1980 Triumph TR8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1980 Triumph TR8 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
| Model | 6C | TR8 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 55 L |
