1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Audi 80
To start off, 1981 Audi 80 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi 80 (136 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 184 kg more than 1981 Audi 80.
Because 1981 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Audi 80 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | 80 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |
