1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 101 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Malibu |
Year Released | 1949 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3788 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |