1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 224 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1949 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2580 mm |