1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1983 Volvo 740
To start off, 1983 Volvo 740 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 740 (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 740 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 102 kg more than 1983 Volvo 740.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1983 Volvo 740 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | 740 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1272 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2780 mm |