1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1984 Volvo 760
To start off, 1984 Volvo 760 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Volvo 760 (153 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 165 kg more than 1984 Volvo 760.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1984 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | 760 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 68 L |