1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 1985 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,553 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Mitsubishi Magna (124 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 330 kg more than 1985 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1985 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | 6C | Magna |
Year Released | 1949 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2600 mm |