1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Caterham |
| Model | 6C | 1700 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 36 L |
