1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C (94 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 36 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1949 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 88 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3030 mm |