1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1986 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,918 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1986 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2918 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |