1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 1988 Acura Integra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Acura Integra (113 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1988 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Acura |
| Model | 6C | Integra |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |
