1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | 6C | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3239 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |
