1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1991 Volvo 480
To start off, 1991 Volvo 480 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Volvo 480 (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Volvo 480 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 550 kg more than 1991 Volvo 480.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Volvo 480, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1991 Volvo 480 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | 480 |
Year Released | 1949 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2510 mm |