1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1992 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1992 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota 4Runner (112 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 52 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1992 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1949 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2630 mm |