1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1994 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1994 Lancia Kappa is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Kappa (204 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 40 kg more than 1994 Lancia Kappa.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1994 Lancia Kappa | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
| Model | 6C | Kappa |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2710 mm |
