1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1997 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 20 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1997 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 6C | Concorde |
Year Released | 1949 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |