1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 126 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Honda |
Model | 6C | CR-V |
Year Released | 1949 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2620 mm |