1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 94 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 31 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML has automatic transmission and 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | ML |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2720 mm |