1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2000 Subaru Forester is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Forester weights approximately 12 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
Model | 6C | Forester |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 74.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |