1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (127 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 187 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 6C | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 127 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |
