1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 166 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 6C | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2210 mm |
