1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Holden UTE
To start off, 2001 Holden UTE is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 50 kg more than 2001 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 6C | UTE |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2950 mm |
