1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2001 SsangYong Musso is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2001 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2001 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | SsangYong |
Model | 6C | Musso |
Year Released | 1949 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 80 L |