1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2002 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2002 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda RX-8 (238 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 36 kg more than 2002 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2002 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1338 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2710 mm |
