1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 458 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 300 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Pagani |
Model | 6C | Zonda |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 547 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2730 mm |