1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 6C | Megane |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2690 mm |