1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | 6C | M3 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3169 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2790 mm |
