1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 32 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |